Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn under. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng
Hiển thị các bài đăng có nhãn under. Hiển thị tất cả bài đăng

Thứ Tư, 24 tháng 4, 2013

Our Diggers' courage under fire

WAR stories told to the Shrine of Remembrance reveal the bravery of our Diggers.

Ern Ramsden

Ern Ramsden was one of only 13 survivors of the sinking of the HMAS Yarra. Source: Herald Sun

Ern Ramsden

IT was a desperate week adrift on a raft in the middle of the Java Sea, but Ern Ramsden never succumbed to drinking sea water.

Many of his mates who had survived the sinking of the HMAS Yarra did, and they never made it off the raft.

Ern, now deceased, told his granddaughter more than 40 years later of his horror week aboard the raft.

Of the 151 crew, Chief Petty Officer Ramsden was one of only 13 survivors.

Many perished from thirst or hunger while aboard the raft after the Japanese Navy sank the ship.

"For two hours we struggled in the water. All the time, the Japanese sailed around us taking snapshots. By the end of the day, only 20 men had survived," Ern told his granddaughter.

"When the sun rose, we found the supplies allotted to the raft. One 14-pound tin of biscuits and a small barrel of water.

"After banging a hole in the biscuit tin, we were unable to reseal it.

"In a short time, the salt water managed to enter both the tin and the barrel, leaving us with no food and no fresh water."

After a week adrift, he was rescued by a Dutch submarine and taken to a hospital in Colombo.

Arthur Bancroft

Arthur Bancroft was taken by the Japanese as a prisoner of war after the HMAS Perth sunk in 1942. Source: Herald Sun

Arthur Bancroft

WHEN the HMAS Perth was sunk in 1942, it was as if Arthur Bancroft had lost his home.

"I wasn't scared, just a strange feeling to think you're losing your home," he said.

The young seaman spent a week floating in the Sunda Strait before the Japanese found him and took him as a prisoner of war.

Arthur was taken to the notorious Burma-Thai Railway and put to work.

Prisoners were told they would have to build a railway - even if it meant over a dead man's body.

All the while Arthur kept a diary, made of rice paper, of his experiences, knowing it would be his death if his guards discovered it.

He survived for almost three years on just one care package from the Red Cross, hoping to get home to his sweetheart Mirla (pictured above, right).

No one back home knew how many survivors there were or what had happened.

Eight months later they broadcast names over the radio and a friend heard Arthur's name. That was the first Mirla heard that her love was still alive.

The pair married after the war and were together until Mirla's death in 2011.

Arthur still lives in Perth with his family.

Roy Holloway

Letters from Roy Holloway from the trenches of France and Turkey were found in 2006, more than a decade after his death. Source: Herald Sun

Roy Holloway

ROY Holloway's full WWI Anzac story might never have been known until his family found moving letters to his sister from the trenches of France and Turkey.

His son Les said the letters and a diary revealed a range of emotions from enlistment, training at Broadmeadows, the flies and heat in Egypt and the Gallipoli landing.

Roy's letters were found in 2006 more than a decade after his death.

In the letters Roy said a mix-up at the landing at Gallipoli saved his life.

"At the landing we went ashore in navy motorboats. The fighting against the Turks took place about two miles away in the hills. The landing should have taken place at a stretch of low beach land half a mile away. This stretch of beach was full of barbed wire under the water," he said.

"No one would have escaped from that as they would have had to jump into waist-deep water from the boats carrying heavy packs. We'd have drowned."

After Gallipoli he went on with the 4th Brigade to the mud and killing fields of France and the battles at Pozieres and Bullecourt. The Germans captured Roy at the battle of Bullecourt and held him prisoner for 20 months.

He finally returned home to his family in Ballarat in 1918.

Steve Ager

Steve Ager (right) was posted to East Timor in 2000. Source: Herald Sun

Steve Ager

IT was the many different nations working toward the goal of East Timor that really stays with Steve Ager.

Steve was posted to East Timor in 2000, and still remembers it as some of the most inspiring times of his 27-year military service.

"Each sector had a number of nationalities posted to it," he said.

"It was not uncommon for an Australian patrol to touch base with a Kenyan patrol or a Portuguese helicopter to transport Korean soldiers into an AO or travel out to the enclave in a Russian helicopter."

On arrival in Dili, the destruction from the riots was still very real. "As was the feelings of the local population to the presence of the UN in their country," he said.

Steve was involved in the investigation of an alleged rape of an East Timorese national by a UN peacekeeper.

"It was one of the hardest things I have ever done to try and reassure him and his family that the UN and CIVPOL would apprehend the individual who had allegedly done this and prosecute them to the length of the law," he said.

David Barrett

David Barrett (right) was a prisoner in a Japanese jail. Source: Herald Sun

David Barrett

FOR medical orderly David Barrett, his fight didn't end once he left the Thai-Burma railway.

David kept fighting for more than 55 years until he was able to get $25,000 in reparation for every man like him who endured the hell of a Japanese prison.

He left Australia in 1941 on the Queen Mary with 2/9th Field Ambulance of the 8th Division AIF.

He did what he could for the wounded in the chaos that was the Malayan campaign, but was captured in 1942.

After spending time in Changi in August 1943, David was moved to the Kanburi No.1 Coolie Hospital.

He had the job of digging graves for the dead, or nearly dead, every single day. He was then moved to Loburi camp as the only medical person for 200 POWs.

After the Japanese surrender in August 1945 he volunteered for the War Graves Commission Party, which returned to the railway to locate and log the graves of those who had died.

A book on his life, Digger's Story, was recently written by David and Brian Robertson.

John Gordon

14-year-old John Gordon was able to enlist to fight in World War I by using his dead brother James' name. Source: Herald Sun

John Gordon

IT was only by using his dead brother James' name that 14-year-old John Gordon was able to enlist to fight in World War I.

He left his Carlton home for war in November and never returned. He served as a part of the 29th Battalion and went to both Egypt and France.

John was just 15 when he was killed in the battle of Fromelles in France.

Initially labelled as missing, his family waited weeks before they were told he would not make it home.

John, and thousands of other Australians, were killed as they tried to rush the heavily defended Sugar Loaf position.

Evidence found from the German war and death records showed John was buried in a mass grave at Pheasant Wood, Fromelles.

His body remained there for more than 100 years until 2009 when an excavation team, with the help of an amateur historian, identified his DNA and his exact age.

Killed at just 15 years, 10 months and one day, James Gordon now holds a place in Anzac history as the youngest Australian recorded to have been killed in action.

Anzac Digger


View the original article here

Thứ Ba, 16 tháng 4, 2013

Holocaust survivor's tale under scrutiny

Alex Kurzem

Alex Kurzem near his Melbourne home.

THE world-famous Nazi hunters at the Simon Wiesenthal Centre are trying to prove the wartime memoirs of Victorian Alex Kurzem are false.

Mr Kurzem claims he watched the Nazi-driven execution of his Jewish mother and siblings before becoming a child mascot for a murderous SS unit in war-torn Europe.

His son, Mark, wrote an international best-selling book that portrays Mr Kurzem as a five-year-old Russian Jew who survived the Holocaust by working closely with an SS extermination squad during World War II.

Mr Kurzem recently told the Herald Sun he stood by the accuracy of everything in the book.

He has been receiving payments since 1999 from the US-based Jewish Claims Conference -- which compensates Jewish Holocaust survivors from funds provided by the German government.

The director of the Simon Wiesenthal Centre's Israel office, Dr Efraim Zuroff, recently wrote to the Claims Conference urging it to hold a new investigation into Mr Kurzem's claim to be a Holocaust survivor.

"Everything in this case appears to point to a scam," he wrote.

"Only a comprehensive investigation can finally determine whether Kurzem is indeed a Holocaust survivor, which I very much doubt, or an imposter whose main motivation was to gain fortune and fame by distorting his unusual wartime experiences."

The Claims Conference has handed over a dossier of evidence disputing Mr Kurzem's claims to its Israel-based ombudsman, Shmuel Hollander, to investigate.

Much of that dossier was prepared by Mr Kurzem's main doubters, forensic genealogist Colleen Fitzpatrick, senior staff at the Melbourne Holocaust Centre and US-based psychologist Dr Barry Resnick, who lost relatives in the Holocaust.

Mr Kurzem has refused an offer by the Herald Sun to organise and pay for medical and DNA tests to help prove his identity and whether or not he is Jewish.

He did recently get a certificate from a doctor in France that says he is circumcised, and he had sent that to the Claims Conference.

But he is continuing to refuse to take a DNA test, which would either prove or disprove claims made in the book about his life that he is a member of the Galperin family.

Mr Kurzem said he had recently taken the circumcision test at the behest of a European film company, which is making a movie about his life, and that he would consider taking a DNA test if the movie makers asked him to.

He said he had been told by others that he was a member of the Galperin family. "I might be. I might be anybody, but I have got no proof who I am," Mr Kurzem said.

keith.moor@news.com.au


View the original article here

Thứ Năm, 11 tháng 4, 2013

Qantas under fire over Facebook frenzy

  • Qantas bombarded with offensive comments
  • Could face legal trouble if drastic action isn't taken
  • Has deleted some offending comments, but not all

QANTAS has been bombarded with offensive comments on Facebook following its decision to remove pork from some flights, and could face legal trouble if they don?t take drastic action on their site.

The decision was sparked by its partnership with Emirates, which came into effect on March 31 and sees flights to Europe stop over in Dubai instead of Singapore.

The mood on social media quickly turned sour after the announcement, with the airline's Facebook and Twitter pages flooded with racist and religiously offensive.

A page has been set up on Tumblr with screenshots of what is claimed to be offensive comments from the Qantas Facebook page.

On Tuesday the airline pleaded with its Facebook users to play by the rules:

"Hi Guys, you may have noticed some comments have been removed from our page. These have been removed as they contravene our house rules. We encourage all feedback on this page, both positive and negative, however comments which violate our house rules will not be tolerated. Please help us keep our Facebook page a fun, enjoyable and respectful community for everyone.  Thanks, the Qantas Social Media Team."

But it seems that hasn't been enough to stop the offensive comments.

APAC digital strategist at communications agency Text 100, Karalee Evans, said the best thing the airline could do in such an extreme situation is to turn off the ability to comment on its Facebook page – a move she said is fairly common among businesses in controversial circumstances.

"It's a tricky situation," she said. "Qantas is doing what you'd suggest to do in terms of deleting the racist and inflammatory comments, making the community aware of the rules and trying to enforce reasonable expectations of the behaviour. But it's not working for them."

"So you can either ride it out, which isn't the best PR move, or you may have to do something more drastic: Qantas may have to remove the ability to comment on the page for a while."

Legally, the responsibility of what appears on its page falls on the airline, not the person making the comment, so if the airline could be in breach on consumer laws and advertising standards if offensive comments aren't removed promptly.

"Current amended regulation from the Advertising Standards Bureau states that a brand is accountable and responsible for anything on their Facebook page just like they are for anything they advertise. This includes comments," she said.

Otherwise the airline could face legal action including fines or a public apology, depending on how quickly the comments are taken down and how many times it happens.

Ultimately, doing nothing isn't an option.

"Qantas has an obligation to regain control very quickly," Ms Evans said.

A Qantas spokesman said it has been removing offensive comments gradually, and said there has been overwhelmingly positive feedback from passengers who've flown the route.

"Our customers tell us that one of the things that sets Qantas apart from other airlines is our high quality in-flight meals," he said.

"Feedback from customers who have flown on Qantas to and from Dubai and experienced the in-flight meals has been excellent.

"Qantas flies to every continent around the world and our on board catering is tailored to meet the differing tastes and cultures to each city that we fly to."


View the original article here

Qantas under fire over Facebook frenzy

  • Qantas bombarded with offensive comments
  • Could face legal trouble if drastic action isn't taken
  • Has deleted some offending comments, but not all

QANTAS has been bombarded with offensive comments on Facebook following its decision to remove pork from some flights, and could face legal trouble if they don?t take drastic action on their site.

The decision was sparked by its partnership with Emirates, which came into effect on March 31 and sees flights to Europe stop over in Dubai instead of Singapore.

The mood on social media quickly turned sour after the announcement, with the airline's Facebook and Twitter pages flooded with racist and religiously offensive.

A page has been set up on Tumblr with screenshots of what is claimed to be offensive comments from the Qantas Facebook page.

On Tuesday the airline pleaded with its Facebook users to play by the rules:

"Hi Guys, you may have noticed some comments have been removed from our page. These have been removed as they contravene our house rules. We encourage all feedback on this page, both positive and negative, however comments which violate our house rules will not be tolerated. Please help us keep our Facebook page a fun, enjoyable and respectful community for everyone.  Thanks, the Qantas Social Media Team."

But it seems that hasn't been enough to stop the offensive comments.

APAC digital strategist at communications agency Text 100, Karalee Evans, said the best thing the airline could do in such an extreme situation is to turn off the ability to comment on its Facebook page – a move she said is fairly common among businesses in controversial circumstances.

"It's a tricky situation," she said. "Qantas is doing what you'd suggest to do in terms of deleting the racist and inflammatory comments, making the community aware of the rules and trying to enforce reasonable expectations of the behaviour. But it's not working for them."

"So you can either ride it out, which isn't the best PR move, or you may have to do something more drastic: Qantas may have to remove the ability to comment on the page for a while."

Legally, the responsibility of what appears on its page falls on the airline, not the person making the comment, so if the airline could be in breach on consumer laws and advertising standards if offensive comments aren't removed promptly.

"Current amended regulation from the Advertising Standards Bureau states that a brand is accountable and responsible for anything on their Facebook page just like they are for anything they advertise. This includes comments," she said.

Otherwise the airline could face legal action including fines or a public apology, depending on how quickly the comments are taken down and how many times it happens.

Ultimately, doing nothing isn't an option.

"Qantas has an obligation to regain control very quickly," Ms Evans said.

A Qantas spokesman said it has been removing offensive comments gradually, and said there has been overwhelmingly positive feedback from passengers who've flown the route.

"Our customers tell us that one of the things that sets Qantas apart from other airlines is our high quality in-flight meals," he said.

"Feedback from customers who have flown on Qantas to and from Dubai and experienced the in-flight meals has been excellent.

"Qantas flies to every continent around the world and our on board catering is tailored to meet the differing tastes and cultures to each city that we fly to."


View the original article here